In the Heat of the Moment

Novak Djokovic and Victoria Azarenka each lost their cool en route to early round upsets in Madrid.

Perhaps more so than others, tennis is a sport in which the gladiator narrative is consistently embraced. It features two competitors going head-to-head in a war of attrition. Heavy forehands and backhands are akin to body blows, and the repetition of these rallies akin to rounds in boxing. If one player wins a long, grueling rally, they’ve “won the battle” but will “lose the war.” As professionals, it should be expected that players are held responsible for all of their actions while on court; however, as tennis continues to embrace this warrior mentality narrative, this really isn’t the case. This was fully on display early in Madrid this week, as Novak Djokovic and Victoria Azarenka flamed out before the quarterfinals; both players did not go quietly, as each was embroiled in controversy in defeat.

Djokovic faced off against rising talent Grigor Dimitrov in the second round on Tuesday. Djokovic, despite suffering what looked like a severe ankle injury in Davis Cup, managed to unseat Rafael Nadal in Monte Carlo and came into Madrid on a solid run of clay court form. On the other hand, Dimitrov has had numerous matches against the ATP’s best in his career and has fallen just short, sometimes agonizingly so, each time.

After Djokovic took a nearly-eight minute medical timeout for an alleged recurrence of his ankle injury when down a set and a break, the Madrid crowd began to turn against the World No. 1. Dimitrov flourished in the increasingly hostile on-court environment, as the partisan crowd let Djokovic know their increased displeasure with everything that he did.

After saving a match point and winning the second set tiebreak, Djokovic had some choice words involving some certain body parts for the crowd in his native language. However, he was not penalized for his outburst. The merit of the audible obscenity rule has long been debated, particularly in situations where the chair umpire does not speak the same language as the offending player. Although Carlos Bernardes speaks multiple languages, Serbian is not one of them. Djokovic would eventually lose the match, and was booed off the court.

Azarenka, playing in her first event since Indian Wells due to an ankle injury, bested Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova in her scrappy return to action on Monday. However, after surrendering a break in the third set to Eakterina Makarova on Wednesday, she lost her cool with chair umpire Mariana Alves. On the first point of the seventh game, Azarenka lamely missed a chipped forehand and decimated her racket. After having previously given Azarenka a warning for an audible English obscenity early in the second set, Alves docked Azarenka a point with her second code violation for racket abuse. The Belarusian did not take too kindly to the penalty, and let Alves know about it. Makarova would eventually win the last five games of the match to claim victory.

This isn’t your typical argument with an umpire; whether she intended to or not, Azarenka took a cheap shot at the umpire from Portugal. Anyone with a sense of tennis history knows Alves’ track record of questionable officiating decisions, highlighted by the infamous match between Serena Williams and Jennifer Capriati at the US Open in 2004. Nonetheless, her previously poor decisions have no bearing in a match where she made an entirely correct decision, and handled Azarenka impeccably. However, by saying what she said to Alves’ face, Azarenka is making her aware that the entire locker room knows of this previous history; she’s undermining Alves’ authority right in front of her for not only that match, but for future matches.

Two outbursts, two different reactions.

A majority of the outrage over Djokovic’s on-court reactions subsided once the match had concluded; a sizable number of people defended the World No. 1, saying that it would have been impossible for him not to react in any way to such a hostile environment. Regardless of the tongue, he still directed profane abuse at fans and other observers, and this is truly inexcusable. On the other hand, Azarenka suffered much post-match scrutiny for an outburst that took place entirely in English. Are these facts correlated? Perhaps.

Of course, players are human and it’s naïve to expect that they not show emotions during a match. However, “the heat of the moment” and “in the midst of battle” should not be appropriate excuses for poor behavior. As two of the top players in tennis, both Djokovic and Azarenka should know how to conduct themselves better on the court. All players should be held to the same standard, regardless of how (and in what language) that this emotion is expressed.

6 Responses to In the Heat of the Moment

  • Dudu says:

    Thank you. Thank you soooo much for holding Novak especially, accountable. With Azarenka, there’s no chance of her not getting any backlash. The media is always willing to jump on her throat.

    But Novak! It was all virtually swept under the carpet. Not even that cause nobody even mentioned it. They were all going on about his non-injury. Instead the crowd was vilified as if Novak did nothing to provoke the crowd.

    Some were even bringing Rafael into it. Like honestly, would the Spanish crowd not jeer Novak in 2011 and 2012 and instead, decide to boo him in 2013 when he wasn’t even playing Rafael?

    You’d almost swear Novak has the tennis media in his pocket. How else would you explain every single one of them not voicing even a shred of outrage?

  • Anna says:

    Novak was a break up when he took MTO. And he was waiting for the trainer; it was not his fault that the trainer came late. So, try to stay with facts.

  • David Kane says:

    First of all, whether the delay was 8 minutes, 8 hours or 8 seconds, a delay is a delay, and crowds don’t like delays. Fair or unfair, that’s reality.

    Second, I honestly don’t think, from the crowd’s perspective, it mattered *when* Djokovic took the time out. It’s just a fact that if a player appears to be acting more injured than they really are (no matter who they are), the crowd is going to cry foul. For every fan calling that player a hero, there’ll be 10 more calling him or her a faker. How he or she handles that criticism is up to that player, but if this becomes a recurring trend (as it has for players like Azarenka and Djokovic), that criticism will only get louder. The point this article seems to be making is that hopefully these excellent, well and deservedly-respected players react to on-court criticism better in the future rather than attempting to crucify them for what they’ve done in the past.

  • Pingback: VIDEO: Victoria Azarenka Calls Out Mariana Alves in Madrid | unseeded & looming

  • Saved as a favorite, I like your website!

  • see it here says:

    I just want to mention I’m beginner to blogging and definitely loved your website. Very likely I’m likely to bookmark your website . You actually come with impressive articles and reviews. Thanks for sharing your blog site.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>